Zerodha co-founder and CEO Nithin Kamath has stirred up a thought-provoking conversation by drawing a parallel between today’s trillion-dollar tech giants and the East India Company, the infamous colonial-era trading firm that once ruled vast parts of South Asia. In a reflective post on X (formerly Twitter), Kamath questioned the unchecked influence of global corporations, suggesting that their dominance could mirror the exploitative trajectory of historical empires.
Kamath’s comments were inspired by his recent reading of William Dalrymple’s “The Anarchy: The Relentless Rise of the East India Company” and Sam Dalrymple’s “Shattered Lands: Five Partitions and the Making of Modern Asia.” These books explore how a private enterprise evolved into a colonial force, redrawing borders and reshaping nations. Kamath used this historical lens to reflect on the rise of trillion-dollar firms and their growing control over digital infrastructure, data, and global economies.
🧭 Timeline of Kamath’s Reflection and Public Response
| Date | Event Description | Impact on Public Discourse |
|---|---|---|
| August 24, 2025 | Kamath posts historical reflection on X | Sparks debate on corporate ethics |
| August 25, 2025 | Media and tech leaders respond | Commentary from economists, entrepreneurs |
| August 25, 2025 | Dalrymple’s books trend on Goodreads | Renewed interest in colonial history |
Kamath’s post read: “It makes me wonder: today, as trillion-dollar companies rise, what happens if they turn evil, too?”—a rhetorical question that resonated widely across social media and business circles.
📊 Comparing Historical and Modern Corporate Power
| Attribute | East India Company (1600s–1858) | Trillion-Dollar Firms (2020s–Present) |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | Chartered by British Crown | Founded by private entrepreneurs |
| Primary Objective | Trade and profit | Technology, data, platform dominance |
| Territorial Control | Governed large parts of South Asia | Influence over digital infrastructure |
| Military Capability | Maintained private armies | No military, but geopolitical sway |
| Accountability | Minimal oversight | Increasing regulatory scrutiny |
| Revenue Scale | Equivalent to 5% of British GDP | Apple, Microsoft, Amazon exceed $1 trillion market cap |
Kamath’s analogy underscores how economic dominance can translate into political and cultural influence, whether through colonial administration or algorithmic governance.
🔍 Books That Inspired Kamath’s Reflection
Kamath credited two books for reshaping his understanding of colonial history and its relevance to modern corporate structures:
- “The Anarchy” by William Dalrymple: Chronicles how the East India Company transformed from a trading firm into a colonial power, using wealth and military force to subjugate territories.
- “Shattered Lands” by Sam Dalrymple: Explores the fragmentation of the Indian Empire and how its dissolution led to the creation of 12 modern nations, including India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and parts of the Gulf and Southeast Asia.
| Book Title | Author | Key Themes |
|---|---|---|
| The Anarchy | William Dalrymple | Corporate greed, colonial conquest |
| Shattered Lands | Sam Dalrymple | Partition, imperial legacy, border politics |
Kamath noted that he had previously viewed partition only in the context of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, but these books revealed a broader canvas—from Muscat and Oman to Burma—once governed from Delhi.
🧠 Kamath’s Warning: What If Corporations Turn “Evil”?
Kamath’s central concern is the potential for trillion-dollar firms to wield disproportionate influence over societies, economies, and even democratic institutions. He pointed to the historical example of the East India Company as a cautionary tale of how unchecked corporate ambition can lead to exploitation.
| Concern Area | Modern Implication |
|---|---|
| Data Monopoly | Surveillance capitalism, privacy erosion |
| Platform Dependency | Economic fragility, market distortion |
| Political Lobbying | Policy capture, regulatory evasion |
| Global Reach | Cultural homogenization, local displacement |
His post has sparked renewed calls for stronger antitrust enforcement, ethical tech governance, and corporate accountability.
📉 Public and Industry Reactions
Kamath’s analogy drew mixed reactions. While many praised his historical insight and ethical stance, others argued that comparing tech firms to colonial powers was an oversimplification.
| Stakeholder Group | Reaction Summary |
|---|---|
| Tech Entrepreneurs | Acknowledged need for introspection |
| Historians | Appreciated revival of colonial discourse |
| Economists | Called for nuanced comparison |
| Regulators | Reiterated importance of oversight |
Some users on X pointed out that while tech firms do not possess armies, their control over digital infrastructure and behavioral data gives them unprecedented leverage.
🔍 Trillion-Dollar Firms and Their Global Influence
Kamath’s post indirectly referenced companies like Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet (Google), Amazon, and Meta—each of which has crossed the trillion-dollar valuation mark and holds significant sway over global markets.
| Company Name | Market Cap (2025) | Key Areas of Influence |
|---|---|---|
| Apple | $2.8 trillion | Devices, payments, privacy |
| Microsoft | $2.6 trillion | Cloud, enterprise software, AI |
| Alphabet (Google) | $1.9 trillion | Search, ads, data, cloud |
| Amazon | $1.7 trillion | E-commerce, logistics, cloud |
| Meta | $1.1 trillion | Social media, VR, digital identity |
These firms shape consumer behavior, influence policy, and often operate with limited accountability across jurisdictions.
📌 Conclusion
Nithin Kamath’s comparison between trillion-dollar corporations and the East India Company is more than a historical musing—it’s a timely reminder of the risks posed by concentrated power in any era. By drawing on colonial history, Kamath invites policymakers, entrepreneurs, and citizens to reflect on the ethical boundaries of corporate influence.
As the global economy becomes increasingly digitized, the lessons from the past—about unchecked ambition, governance failures, and the consequences of monopolistic control—remain more relevant than ever.
—
Disclaimer: This article is based on publicly available news reports and official statements as of August 25, 2025. It is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, historical, or legal advice.
