The Meghalaya Pradesh Youth Congress (MPYC) has called for an independent judicial investigation into allegations of sexual and physical abuse within Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) camps, following the tragic death of Anandu Aji, a 26-year-old IT professional from Kerala. Aji, who died by suicide earlier this month, left behind a disturbing social media post detailing years of alleged abuse during his childhood at RSS-run camps. The incident has triggered widespread outrage and demands for accountability across political and civil society circles.
Addressing a press conference in Shillong on October 15, 2025, MPYC leaders stated that the allegations “cannot be brushed aside” and urged the Union Home Ministry to initiate a court-monitored probe. They emphasized that the issue transcends political boundaries and concerns the safety of thousands of children attending ideological camps across India. The Youth Congress also submitted a memorandum to the Meghalaya Governor, seeking his intervention to raise the matter at the national level.
🧠 Key Highlights from MPYC’s Statement and National Reactions
| Element | Details |
|---|---|
| Organization | Meghalaya Pradesh Youth Congress (MPYC) |
| Date | October 15, 2025 |
| Location | Shillong |
| Allegations Origin | Kerala (Anandu Aji, deceased IT professional) |
| Accused Entity | Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) |
| MPYC Demand | Independent judicial probe |
| Broader Concern | Child safety in ideological camps |
The MPYC also called upon child rights bodies and women’s commissions to take suo motu cognizance of the allegations.
📊 Timeline of Events Leading to MPYC’s Probe Demand
| Date | Event Description |
|---|---|
| October 10 | Anandu Aji found dead in Kerala |
| October 11 | Social media post reveals alleged RSS abuse |
| October 12 | Priyanka Gandhi demands national-level inquiry |
| October 13 | Congress calls for probe into RSS camp activities |
| October 15 | MPYC submits memorandum to Meghalaya Governor |
The Youth Congress has also urged the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to intervene and ensure justice for the victim’s family.
🗣️ Reactions from Political Leaders and Civil Society
- Priyanka Gandhi Vadra: “Lakhs of children attend RSS camps. Their safety must be guaranteed.”
- Pawan Khera (Congress): “This is the government of the RSS, by the RSS, and for the RSS.”
- RSS Statement: Denied allegations, termed them politically motivated.
| Stakeholder Group | Reaction Summary |
|---|---|
| Congress Leaders | Demanding full transparency |
| RSS Supporters | Denying allegations, citing political bias |
| Civil Rights Activists | Calling for child protection audits |
| Media | Tracking developments and public sentiment |
The issue has reignited debates over the role of ideological organizations in child education and social conditioning.
🧾 Allegations and Institutional Responses
| Allegation Type | Description | Response Status |
|---|---|---|
| Sexual Abuse | Repeated abuse during childhood | Under preliminary review |
| Physical Abuse | Punitive discipline and isolation | No formal inquiry initiated |
| Psychological Trauma | Long-term mental health deterioration | Family seeking legal support |
| Institutional Neglect | Lack of redressal mechanisms | NHRC and NCPCR yet to respond |
| Political Shielding | Alleged protection from ruling party | Congress demanding accountability |
The Youth Congress has also proposed a national registry of ideological camps and mandatory child safety audits.
🧭 What to Watch in the Coming Days
- Judicial Action: Whether courts admit petitions for independent probe
- Government Response: Home Ministry’s stance on RSS camp oversight
- Civil Society Mobilization: Protests and awareness campaigns expected
- Media Investigations: Potential exposés on camp structures and practices
MPYC leaders concluded, “This is not about politics. It’s about justice, accountability, and the safety of our children.”
Disclaimer
This news content is based on verified political statements, media reports, and public records as of October 17, 2025. It is intended for editorial use and public awareness. The information does not constitute legal advice, political endorsement, or investigative conclusion and adheres to ethical journalism standards.
Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.