The Assam Jatiya Parishad (AJP) has escalated its protest against Delhi-based activist and former Planning Commission member Syeda Saiyidain Hameed, filing formal complaints across 16 districts of Assam demanding her arrest for allegedly making “anti-Assam” and “communal” statements. The move comes in response to remarks made by Hameed during her recent visit to Guwahati and later in Delhi, which AJP leaders claim insulted Assamese identity and threatened communal harmony.
The controversy centers around Hameed’s comments defending the presence of Bangladeshi nationals in Assam. “What is the problem if Bangladeshis live in Assam? Bangladeshis are also humans,” she reportedly said on August 24 in Guwahati. A day later, she allegedly described Assam as a “dangerous place” and accused the Assamese community of playing the role of a “Frankenstein”.
🧭 Timeline of Events Leading to FIRs
| Date | Event Description | Location |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2025 | Syeda Hameed makes remarks defending Bangladeshis | Guwahati |
| Aug 25, 2025 | Further comments made in Delhi | Delhi |
| Aug 29, 2025 | AJP files FIRs in 16 districts | Across Assam |
| Aug 30, 2025 | Political reactions intensify | Statewide |
The AJP has accused Hameed of attempting to provoke ethnic tensions and insult the legacy of the Assam Agitation (1979–1985), which sought the removal of illegal immigrants from the state.
📊 Districts Where FIRs Were Filed
| District Name | FIR Status | Key Allegation |
|---|---|---|
| Kamrup (Metro) | Registered | Insult to Assamese identity |
| Kamrup (Rural) | Registered | Attempt to provoke communal discord |
| Dibrugarh | Registered | Defamation of indigenous communities |
| Tinsukia | Registered | Anti-Assam sentiment |
| Sivasagar | Registered | Public mischief |
| Charaideo | Registered | Disruption of social harmony |
| Jorhat | Registered | Communal provocation |
| Nagaon | Registered | Defamatory statements |
| Chirang | Registered | Threat to public tranquility |
| Kokrajhar | Registered | Ethnic division |
| Dhubri | Registered | Insult to Assam Agitation martyrs |
| Bajali | Registered | Defamation |
| Barpeta | Registered | Communal incitement |
| Nalbari | Registered | Attempt to destabilize peace |
| Karimganj | Registered | Anti-national rhetoric |
| Goalpara | Registered | Violation of public order |
The FIRs cite Sections 195 (offences against public tranquility), 353 (intent to cause public mischief), and 356 (defamation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), along with other applicable provisions.
🔍 AJP’s Allegations and Political Position
AJP general secretary Jagadish Bhuyan stated, “Syeda Hameed’s remarks are not accidental. They are part of a calculated script to disturb communal harmony in Assam. If the government does not act, it will be clear she is speaking on behalf of the chief minister’s propaganda machinery”.
The party also alleged that Hameed maintains close ties with a journalist employed in a media organization owned by Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma’s family, suggesting her statements were politically motivated.
| Allegation Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Communal Provocation | Attempt to divide communities |
| Defamation of Assamese People | Insult to cultural and ethnic identity |
| Political Collusion | Alleged links to CM’s media network |
| Threat to Peace | Potential trigger for ethnic unrest |
🔥 Reactions from Political and Civil Society Groups
The controversy has drawn sharp reactions from across the political spectrum. Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma condemned Hameed’s remarks, calling them an attempt to “legitimize infiltrators” and “realize Jinnah’s dream of making Assam a part of Pakistan”.
| Stakeholder | Reaction Summary | Tone/Position |
|---|---|---|
| Himanta Biswa Sarma | “Bangladeshis are not welcome in Assam” | Strongly critical |
| Kiren Rijiju | “It’s about land, not religion” | Defensive of Assam’s demographic integrity |
| AASU (Student Union) | “Insult to Assam Agitation martyrs” | Condemnatory |
| Civil Rights Groups | Call for balanced dialogue | Cautiously critical |
Activist groups have urged restraint, warning that legal action must not suppress free speech, while others argue that Hameed’s remarks crossed the line into incitement.
📉 Assam’s Demographic Concerns and Historical Context
The Assam Agitation (1979–1985) was a mass movement demanding the identification and deportation of illegal immigrants from Bangladesh. The movement led to the signing of the Assam Accord in 1985, which remains a cornerstone of the state’s immigration policy.
| Issue Area | Historical Context | Current Concern |
|---|---|---|
| Illegal Immigration | Assam Accord mandates 1971 cutoff date | Alleged voter list manipulation |
| Demographic Shift | Indigenous communities reduced to minority | Muslim population exceeds 50% in districts |
| Political Representation | Bangladeshis accused of becoming kingmakers | Threat to Assamese language and culture |
The Gauhati High Court has previously observed that illegal immigrants have enrolled in voter lists, raising concerns about electoral integrity and indigenous rights.
🧠 Legal and Constitutional Perspectives
Legal experts have weighed in on the FIRs, noting that while freedom of speech is protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, it is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2), including public order and incitement to offence.
| Expert Name | Designation | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Advocate R. Mehta | Constitutional Lawyer | “If remarks incite communal tension, FIRs are valid.” |
| Prof. Meera Menon | Public Policy Analyst | “Balance between free speech and public harmony is key.” |
| Dr. Sandeep Shastri | Political Scientist | “The issue reflects Assam’s deep-rooted identity anxieties.” |
They emphasized that the courts must determine whether Hameed’s statements constitute incitement or fall within the bounds of protected speech.
📌 Conclusion
The Assam Jatiya Parishad’s decision to file FIRs against Syeda Hameed in 16 districts marks a significant escalation in the state’s ongoing debate over identity, immigration, and communal harmony. While Hameed’s defenders argue for her right to express humanitarian concerns, critics see her remarks as a direct affront to Assam’s cultural and political legacy.
As legal proceedings unfold, the case will test the boundaries of free speech, political accountability, and the state’s commitment to preserving its unique identity. Whether this controversy leads to arrest, legal action, or broader dialogue remains to be seen—but Assam’s fault lines have once again come into sharp focus.
—
Disclaimer: This article is based on publicly available news reports and official statements as of August 30, 2025. It is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, political, or journalistic advice.
