When it comes to weight loss, both jogging and cycling are excellent forms of cardio exercise, but which one is more effective? Experts suggest that the answer depends on individual fitness goals, calorie burn, and impact on joints.
Calorie Burn and Weight Loss
Jogging generally burns more calories per minute than cycling because it engages more muscle groups. However, cycling allows for longer workout durations, making it easier to sustain higher calorie expenditure over time.
- Jogging: A person weighing 70 kg burns approximately 600-700 calories per hour while jogging at a moderate pace.
- Cycling: The same individual burns 500-600 calories per hour when cycling at a moderate intensity.
Impact on Joints and Muscle Engagement
- Jogging is a high-impact exercise, which can put stress on the knees and ankles. It strengthens bones and muscles, but may not be ideal for individuals with joint issues.
- Cycling is a low-impact workout, making it gentler on joints while still providing muscle toning benefits, particularly for the legs and core.
Which One Should You Choose?
Experts recommend choosing based on personal preference and physical condition. If you prefer higher calorie burn and full-body engagement, jogging may be the better option. If you want a joint-friendly, endurance-based workout, cycling is ideal.
Ultimately, both exercises contribute to weight loss, cardiovascular health, and muscle toning, making them valuable additions to any fitness routine.
Stay tuned for more health and fitness updates.
