Kolkata Law College Rape Case: ‘Mango’ Mishra’s Shocking Activities Inside Student Union Room Exposed

Nothing 35 1

In a shocking revelation that has intensified public outrage, investigators in the Kolkata law college rape case have revealed that the prime accused, identified as ‘Mango’ Mishra, allegedly turned the student union room into his personal bar, consuming alcohol with friends every evening. The case, which involves the brutal rape of a 20-year-old law student, has not only triggered massive protests but also exposed a nexus of criminal impunity and political protection on campus.

Key Developments

  • ‘Mango’ Mishra used union room as bar: Investigators recovered liquor bottles and glasses from the room.
  • Rape victim alleged harassment over months: Mishra and associates would threaten her against complaints.
  • Accused known for violent behaviour: He reportedly assaulted students who questioned his activities.
  • College authorities silent for long: Students claim complaints to management were ignored.
  • Political links under scanner: Mishra’s influence traced to local leaders who enabled his campus control.

What Happened?

The 20-year-old victim, a first-year law student, filed a complaint stating that on multiple occasions, Mishra and his associates harassed her and other girls. The complaint further alleged that on the day of the crime, she was forcibly taken to the union room, assaulted, and raped.

Investigating officers, while inspecting the union room, found:

EvidenceDetails
Liquor bottlesMultiple empty whisky bottles under the table.
Drinking glassesStrewn across desks and shelves.
Leftover snacksPackets of fried items and peanuts indicating routine gatherings.
Used condomsSealed as crucial forensic evidence.
Torn postersSuggesting forceful removal of anti-harassment campaign notices.

Student Testimonies

Several students revealed that Mishra:

  1. Occupied the union room daily post classes, consuming alcohol with a group of 6-8 friends.
  2. Intimidated juniors and female students, passing vulgar comments.
  3. Beat up rival union supporters to retain control over the room and campus activities.
  4. Hosted overnight parties despite college restrictions.

One student said:

“He used to drink there every evening. We were scared to even walk past the union room after classes.”

Political Nexus

Sources indicate Mishra’s dominance was backed by local political leaders who:

  • Ensured college authorities remained silent despite repeated student complaints.
  • Shielded him from police action when minor assault complaints were lodged earlier.
  • Used him to mobilise student crowds for rallies and events in the city.

Reaction From College Administration

The college principal, under intense scrutiny, issued a statement saying:

“We are cooperating with police fully. Disciplinary proceedings are underway against all students involved. Campus security lapses will be addressed immediately.”

However, student groups allege the administration turned a blind eye for months, enabling the toxic environment to thrive.

Public And Political Outrage

StakeholderReaction
Women’s Rights GroupsDemanded exemplary punishment and protection for complainant.
State OppositionCalled for judicial inquiry into political patronage allegations.
National Commission for WomenIssued notice to college authorities seeking detailed report.

Social media platforms witnessed widespread anger with trending hashtags calling for #JusticeForKolkataLawStudent and stricter campus safety policies.

Legal Action So Far

  • Mango Mishra arrested: Charged under IPC sections for rape, criminal intimidation, and wrongful confinement.
  • Co-accused detained: Two friends booked for abetment and destruction of evidence.
  • Police formed SIT: Special Investigation Team constituted to probe political links.
  • Victim’s statement recorded: Under Section 164 CrPC before magistrate.
  • Medical examination confirms assault: Further forensic results awaited.

Impact On Campus

Students say classes have been disrupted as protests continue demanding:

  1. Permanent expulsion of accused and all associates.
  2. Resignation of faculty members accused of ignoring complaints.
  3. Installation of CCTV cameras across campus premises.
  4. Formation of an internal complaints committee with external women’s rights representatives.

Experts’ Analysis

Dr Anindita Mukherjee, Gender Studies Professor:
“Campus sexual violence is perpetuated by cultures of impunity where powerful students, often politically backed, treat common spaces as personal fiefdoms. Strong administrative action is the first deterrent.”

Advocate Raghav Sen, Criminal Lawyer:
“The evidence of routine drinking sessions in a student union room points to deeper institutional failure. Prosecution must use CCTV footage, digital records, and witness testimonies to establish systemic negligence.”

Past Incidents Of Campus Harassment

YearInstitutionNature of Incident
2018Kolkata university collegeMolestation of student leader during event.
2020North Bengal collegeGroup harassment inside girls hostel.
2022South Kolkata law collegeRepeated sexual harassment complaints ignored by principal.

Way Forward

Women’s rights activists emphasise that:

  • Mere arrests will not solve systemic issues.
  • Mandatory gender sensitisation programmes must be introduced in all state colleges.
  • Anonymous reporting mechanisms and independent grievance redressal bodies are urgently needed.

Conclusion

The Kolkata law college rape case exposes how toxic masculinity, political impunity, and administrative negligence combine to create unsafe campus environments. As the investigation progresses, public attention remains firmly on ensuring justice for the victim and dismantling entrenched systems that enable such crimes.


Disclaimer: This news article is for informational purposes only based on currently available reports. It does not constitute legal advice or establish guilt until proven in court. Readers are encouraged to follow official police and court statements for verified developments. The publication is not responsible for decisions made based on the information presented.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *