In a politically charged development ahead of the winter session, a court in Bihar’s Sheikhpura district has issued summons to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, RJD’s Tejashwi Yadav, and Vikassheel Insaan Party chief Mukesh Sahani over alleged derogatory remarks made against Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the Congress-led Voter Adhikar Yatra held in August 2025. The order was passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate Vibha Rani on October 13, following a complaint filed by BJP leader Hiralal Singh on September 4.
The leaders have been directed to appear in person or through legal representatives on November 26, 2025. The complaint alleges that the speeches delivered during the rally violated sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) related to defamation, public mischief, and promoting enmity.
🧠 Key Highlights of the Court Summons
| Element | Details |
|---|---|
| Court | Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura, Bihar |
| Date of Summons | October 13, 2025 |
| Leaders Summoned | Rahul Gandhi, Tejashwi Yadav, Mukesh Sahani |
| Complaint Filed By | BJP leader Hiralal Singh |
| Alleged Incident | Voter Adhikar Yatra, August 2025 |
| Appearance Date | November 26, 2025 |
| IPC Sections Invoked | 153A, 500, 505(2) |
The complaint claims that the speeches were not only defamatory but also aimed at inciting political hostility and undermining public trust in constitutional institutions.
📊 Timeline of Events Leading to Summons
| Date | Event Description |
|---|---|
| August 2025 | Voter Adhikar Yatra held in Bihar |
| September 4 | Complaint filed by BJP leader |
| October 13 | Summons issued by CJM Vibha Rani |
| November 26 | Scheduled court appearance |
The Voter Adhikar Yatra was part of the INDIA bloc’s campaign to highlight electoral reforms and voter rights, but certain speeches allegedly crossed legal boundaries.
🗣️ Reactions from Political Circles
- Congress Spokesperson: “This is a politically motivated move to stifle dissent.”
- RJD Leader: “We will respond legally and democratically.”
- BJP Statement: “No one is above the law. Accountability must prevail.”
| Stakeholder Group | Reaction Summary |
|---|---|
| INDIA Bloc Supporters | Called it judicial overreach |
| Legal Experts | Emphasized due process and evidence |
| Political Analysts | See it as part of pre-election strategy |
| Civil Society Groups | Urged restraint and respect for free speech |
The case has reignited debates around freedom of expression, political accountability, and judicial activism in India’s democratic framework.
🧾 Legal Provisions Invoked in the Complaint
| IPC Section | Description |
|---|---|
| 153A | Promoting enmity between groups |
| 500 | Defamation |
| 505(2) | Statements creating or promoting enmity |
Legal experts note that conviction under these sections requires proof of intent and public impact, which will be central to the proceedings.
🧭 What Happens Next
- Legal Representation: Leaders may seek exemption or file counter-petitions
- Evidence Submission: Video footage and transcripts to be examined
- Political Impact: May influence campaign narratives in Bihar and beyond
- Judicial Review: Higher courts may be approached for relief
The summons adds a new layer to the INDIA bloc’s political challenges as it prepares for the 2026 general elections.
Disclaimer
This news content is based on verified legal documents, public statements, and media reports as of October 14, 2025. It is intended for editorial use and public awareness. The information does not constitute legal advice, political endorsement, or judicial opinion and adheres to ethical journalism standards.
Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?