Riniki Bhuyan Sharma Files Criminal Defamation Case Against Akhil Gogoi Over Alleged False Claims

In a dramatic escalation of political and legal tensions in Assam, entrepreneur and media executive Riniki Bhuyan Sharma—wife of Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma—has filed a criminal defamation case against Raijor Dal chief and Sibsagar MLA Akhil Gogoi. The case, registered under CR Case No. 502/25 at the Chief Judicial Magistrate’s Court in Guwahati, stems from Gogoi’s alleged defamatory remarks made during a protest on September 30, 2025, concerning the death of singer Zubeen Garg in Singapore.

Backdrop of the Controversy

During the protest, Akhil Gogoi demanded a formal inquiry into Zubeen Garg’s death and allegedly accused Riniki Bhuyan Sharma and her company, Golden Threads of Assam, of organizing an event at the North East Festival in Singapore where the singer passed away. Gogoi’s statements implied that Sharma’s firm was involved in a fashion show held during the festival, despite the tragic circumstances.

Sharma’s legal counsel, Advocate Kishor Dutta, categorically denied the allegations, stating that Golden Threads of Assam had no involvement whatsoever with the festival. “These statements are not only false but deeply damaging to my client’s reputation,” Dutta said. He further clarified that on the day of Zubeen Garg’s demise, both Riniki Bhuyan Sharma and her husband personally visited the singer’s residence in Kahilipara, Guwahati, to offer condolences to his wife, Garima Saikia Garg.

Legal Action and Named Individuals

The defamation complaint also names Taufiquddin Ahmad, Director of the news portal Pratibimba Live, for allegedly amplifying the false claims. Sharma has instructed her legal team to initiate further proceedings against AJP leader Lurin Jyoti Gogoi and others accused of circulating misinformation on social media platforms.

The next hearing in the case is scheduled for October 30, 2025, where the court will examine the preliminary evidence and decide on the admissibility of charges.

Key Individuals Named in Defamation Case

Riniki Bhuyan Sharma’s Public Response

In a statement posted on her official Facebook account, Sharma expressed deep disappointment over what she termed “political mudslinging.” She emphasized her longstanding admiration for Zubeen Garg and his contributions to her entrepreneurial journey, particularly in the success of News Live, a media outlet she founded.

“In these difficult times, I prefer not to involve the name of someone I deeply admire. It is disheartening to see his legacy being drawn into political controversies,” Sharma wrote.

In a sharp yet composed rebuttal, she added, “Through my organization, PEEPL, I am extending assistance to Akhil Gogoi—offering him a first-class ticket to Singapore, five-star accommodation, and logistical support to gather evidence. Once he returns from his fact-finding mission, we shall meet in court on October 30. Let justice prevail.”

Timeline of Events Leading to Defamation Case

Political and Social Implications

The case has stirred debate across Assam’s political spectrum. While supporters of Riniki Bhuyan Sharma view the legal action as a necessary step to uphold dignity and truth, critics argue that it may stifle dissent and political expression. Akhil Gogoi, known for his activism and vocal criticism of the state government, has yet to issue a formal response.

The controversy also raises questions about the role of media and social platforms in amplifying unverified claims. Legal experts suggest that the case could set a precedent for defamation accountability in the digital age.

Public Sentiment and Media Reaction

Public reactions have been polarized. While many have expressed solidarity with Sharma, others have called for a transparent investigation into the circumstances surrounding Zubeen Garg’s death. Media outlets have largely refrained from taking sides, focusing instead on the legal merits and procedural developments.

Defamation Case Trends in Assam (2020–2025)

What’s Next

Legal proceedings will continue through October, with both parties expected to submit evidence and witness statements. If the court finds merit in the complaint, it could lead to formal charges under Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code, which deal with criminal defamation.

Disclaimer: This news content is based on publicly available legal filings, official statements, and media reports as of October 9, 2025. It is intended for editorial use and public awareness. The information does not constitute legal advice or endorsement of any party and adheres to ethical journalism standards.