Suvendu Adhikari Targets Mamata’s Bhabanipur Stronghold as TMC Sharpens Strategy in Nandigram Ahead of Bengal Polls

West Bengal’s political battlefield is heating up as Leader of Opposition Suvendu Adhikari intensifies his campaign against Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee in her home constituency of Bhabanipur, while the Trinamool Congress (TMC) shifts its focus to Adhikari’s bastion, Nandigram. With assembly elections due next year, both camps are preparing for a prestige battle that could redefine Bengal’s political landscape.

Adhikari, who narrowly defeated Mamata in Nandigram in 2021 by 1,956 votes—a result still under judicial review—has commissioned a booth-level survey in Bhabanipur to identify voter patterns, weaknesses, and potential swing areas. Meanwhile, TMC’s national general secretary Abhishek Banerjee has held multiple meetings with district and block-level leaders in East Midnapore, signaling a renewed push to reclaim Nandigram.

🧭 Strategic Realignment: Bhabanipur vs Nandigram

The symbolism of these two constituencies is profound. Bhabanipur has been Mamata’s fortress for over a decade, while Nandigram remains the epicenter of her most dramatic political gamble—a gamble that backfired in 2021.

📊 BJP’s Bhabanipur Strategy Under Suvendu Adhikari

Adhikari’s team is reportedly gathering granular voter data in Bhabanipur, mapping booth-level strengths and weaknesses from the 2021 election. A senior BJP functionary revealed that the party is considering opening a dedicated office in the constituency to coordinate campaign efforts.

Adhikari has publicly stated that “thousands of fake names will be deleted this time” and vowed to ensure Mamata’s defeat from Bhabanipur.

🔍 TMC’s Counter-Offensive in Nandigram

In response, the TMC is quietly ramping up its presence in Nandigram. Abhishek Banerjee has met leaders from several organizational districts, including Tamluk, and emphasized the need for a “separate, focused strategy” for the constituency.

TMC insiders believe that defeating Suvendu in his own backyard would be a political masterstroke and a symbolic payback.

🧠 Political Symbolism and Historical Context

Nandigram is not just a constituency—it’s a symbol. The 2007 anti-land acquisition movement led by Mamata Banerjee and supported by Suvendu Adhikari was the turning point that toppled the Left Front and brought TMC to power. Adhikari, once Mamata’s trusted lieutenant, switched to the BJP in December 2020, triggering a high-voltage showdown in 2021.

The BJP continues to taunt Mamata as a “compartmental chief minister” who lost her chosen battlefield, while TMC jibes back at Adhikari as the “load-shedding opposition leader,” referencing alleged irregularities during vote counting.

📉 Electoral Stakes and Prestige Battle

Political analysts believe the Bhabanipur-Nandigram duel is no longer just about two constituencies—it’s about two ideologies, two legacies, and two leaders.

Biswanath Chakraborty, a political scientist, noted, “Both sides want to prove that the other’s stronghold is not impregnable. It’s a prestige battle within a larger war.”

🧠 Ground-Level Mobilization and Voter Sentiment

Both parties are ramping up grassroots mobilization. BJP is focusing on youth outreach and voter roll scrutiny in Bhabanipur, while TMC is engaging booth-level workers and local influencers in Nandigram.

The emotional resonance of Nandigram, coupled with Mamata’s legacy, makes it a high-stakes constituency for both camps.

📌 Conclusion

As West Bengal gears up for its next assembly election, the Bhabanipur-Nandigram face-off is emerging as the defining contest. Suvendu Adhikari’s aggressive push into Mamata’s stronghold and TMC’s strategic recalibration in Nandigram reflect a deeper political churn—one that goes beyond numbers and into the realm of symbolism, legacy, and leadership.

Whether Mamata can defend Bhabanipur or reclaim Nandigram, and whether Suvendu can hold his turf or breach hers, will shape the narrative of Bengal’s next political chapter.

—

Disclaimer: This article is based on publicly available news reports and official statements as of August 24, 2025. It is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute political, legal, or electoral advice.