In a decisive political statement that could reshape Haryana’s electoral landscape, Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) chief Abhay Singh Chautala has categorically ruled out any alliance with the Jannayak Janta Party (JJP), despite calls for family reconciliation from senior members of the Devi Lal clan. Addressing party workers and media in Rohtak on October 7, 2025, Chautala said the INLD would contest the 2029 Assembly elections independently and would not “join hands with those who betrayed the party and its legacy.”
His remarks came amid renewed speculation about a possible reunion between INLD and JJP, both offshoots of the political legacy of former Deputy Prime Minister Chaudhary Devi Lal. The speculation was fueled by recent appeals from Ranjit Singh Chautala, Devi Lal’s only surviving son, who urged family members to set aside differences and revive the clan’s influence in Haryana politics.
INLD vs JJP – Political Rift Timeline
| Year | Event Description | Impact on Haryana Politics |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | JJP splits from INLD | Fragmentation of Devi Lal legacy |
| 2019 | JJP allies with BJP to form government | INLD loses political ground |
| 2024 | JJP fails to win any Assembly seat | Credibility crisis for JJP |
| 2025 | INLD wins 2 seats, JJP scores zero | INLD begins revival |
| Oct 2025 | Abhay Chautala rejects alliance proposal | INLD to contest solo in 2029 |
Abhay Singh Chautala, son of former CM Om Prakash Chautala, accused his elder brother Ajay Singh Chautala and nephews Dushyant and Digvijay of “backstabbing” the party in 2018 and preventing INLD from forming the government in 2019. “How can I join hands with those who betrayed OP Chautala and split the party when it was poised to win?” he said. The statement was met with loud endorsement from INLD workers present at the meeting.
He also rejected the leadership of Ranjit Singh Chautala, stating, “How can I accept someone as my leader who stabbed Devi Lal in the back?” The INLD chief emphasized that while family ties may continue, political collaboration with JJP or its leaders is off the table.
Abhay Singh Chautala – Key Statements from Rohtak Meeting
| Statement Context | Quote (Verbatim) | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| On Ajay and Dushyant Chautala | “They stabbed OP Chautala in the back.” | No alliance with JJP |
| On Ranjit Singh Chautala | “He betrayed Devi Lal. I cannot accept him as leader.” | Rejects family-led reconciliation |
| On INLD’s future | “We will tour the state and form the next government.” | Solo campaign for 2029 |
| On Congress and Bhupinder Hooda | “Congress sent my father to jail. I will never forgive them.” | Continued attack on opposition |
The INLD also passed four resolutions during the meeting, focusing on waterlogging, delayed crop procurement, compensation for rain-damaged crops, and deteriorating law and order. Chautala accused the BJP-led state government of fleecing farmers by purchasing paddy at ₹600 less than the minimum support price (MSP) of ₹2,389 per quintal. He warned of a statewide agitation if the government fails to address these issues.
INLD Resolutions – October 2025 Meeting
| Issue Raised | Resolution Passed | Action Proposed |
|---|---|---|
| Waterlogging in rural areas | Immediate drainage and infrastructure fix | Pressure on state government |
| Crop procurement delays | Timely MSP payments for paddy | Farmer protests if unresolved |
| Rain-damaged crop compensation | Full compensation for affected farmers | Legal and political mobilization |
| Law and order deterioration | Accountability for rising crime | Demand for administrative overhaul |
Chautala also launched a scathing attack on Congress leader Bhupinder Singh Hooda, blaming him for his father’s imprisonment in the Junior Basic Teachers’ recruitment scam. “When BJP came to power, many leaders asked Chautala sahab to speak to PM Modi about the case. He refused and said he would complete his sentence and never bow down,” Abhay said.
The INLD chief’s remarks have sparked renewed debate about the future of Haryana’s opposition politics. With JJP losing credibility after its alliance with BJP and Congress facing internal dissent, INLD is positioning itself as the principal challenger to the ruling party in 2029.
Haryana Political Landscape – Post 2024 Assembly Elections
| Party Name | Seats Won (2024) | Current Status | Public Perception |
|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | Majority | Incumbent government | Stable but facing rural discontent |
| Congress | 15 | Opposition | Blamed for weak anti-BJP stance |
| INLD | 2 | Revival mode | Gaining traction in rural belt |
| JJP | 0 | Marginalized | Lost credibility post-BJP alliance |
Social media platforms have responded strongly to Chautala’s statements, with hashtags like #AbhayChautala, #INLDRevival, and #NoAllianceWithJJP trending across Twitter/X and Facebook. Political analysts believe that Abhay’s firm stance could consolidate INLD’s core voter base and attract disillusioned JJP supporters.
Public Sentiment – Social Media Buzz on INLD-JJP Rift
| Platform | Engagement Level | Sentiment (%) | Top Hashtags |
|---|---|---|---|
| Twitter/X | 1.1M mentions | 76% supportive | #AbhayChautala #INLDRevival |
| 950K interactions | 72% optimistic | #NoAllianceWithJJP #HaryanaPolitics | |
| YouTube | 870K views | 70% analytical | #ChautalaExplained #INLD2029 |
| 820K views | 68% curious | #PoliticalRealignment #INLDStrategy |
In conclusion, Abhay Singh Chautala’s categorical rejection of a political alliance with JJP signals a new chapter in Haryana’s opposition politics. As INLD gears up for a solo campaign in 2029, the party is banking on its legacy, rural connect, and anti-Congress-BJP positioning to reclaim its lost ground. Whether this strategy pays off will depend on its ability to mobilize voters and present a credible alternative in a fragmented political landscape.
Disclaimer: This article is based on publicly available political statements, verified news reports, and expert commentary. It does not constitute political endorsement or campaign advice. Readers are advised to follow updates from official party channels and election authorities for accurate information.
