In a deeply emotional and politically charged statement, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma lashed out at those who, he claimed, maligned singer Zubeen Garg during his lifetime but are now glorifying him posthumously. Speaking on October 16, 2025, Sarma said, “When Zubeen was alive, they defamed him; today they worship him,” referring to what he called a hypocritical shift in public and political sentiment following the singer’s tragic death.
Zubeen Garg, a cultural icon in Assam and Northeast India, passed away under controversial circumstances last month. His death has sparked widespread mourning, tributes, and renewed appreciation for his artistic legacy. However, Sarma’s remarks came in the wake of violent protests in Baksa district, where police had to use batons and tear gas to disperse a mob attacking a convoy carrying five individuals arrested in connection with the singer’s death. The CM warned against politicizing Zubeen’s legacy and urged restraint and respect.
🧠 Key Highlights from Himanta Biswa Sarma’s Statement
| Element | Details |
|---|---|
| Speaker | Himanta Biswa Sarma, Chief Minister of Assam |
| Date | October 16, 2025 |
| Location | Guwahati |
| Statement | “When Zubeen was alive, they defamed him; today they worship him.” |
| Context | Reaction to protests and posthumous tributes |
| Targeted Groups | Political opponents, opportunistic supporters |
Sarma also confirmed that Singapore Police will meet with the Assam SIT team on October 21 to advance the investigation into Zubeen’s death.
📊 Timeline of Events Surrounding Zubeen Garg’s Death
| Date | Event Description |
|---|---|
| September 23 | Zubeen Garg passes away in Singapore |
| September 24 | Assam government announces state funeral |
| October 10 | Five suspects arrested in connection with death |
| October 15 | Mob attacks police convoy in Baksa district |
| October 16 | Himanta Sarma issues statement condemning hypocrisy |
The Assam government has constituted a 10-member SIT to probe the circumstances of Garg’s death, with international cooperation underway.
🗣️ Reactions from Political and Cultural Circles
- Assam Congress: “Sarma should focus on justice, not rhetoric.”
- Cultural Activists: “Zubeen’s legacy must be protected from political exploitation.”
- Public Sentiment: “Zubeen was a rebel, a voice of the people. He deserves truth, not theatrics.”
| Stakeholder Group | Reaction Summary |
|---|---|
| Political Leaders | Divided over Sarma’s remarks |
| Artists and Musicians | Calling for dignity and transparency |
| Citizens | Mourning Zubeen, demanding accountability |
| Media | Tracking SIT progress and public discourse |
Zubeen Garg’s music and activism had often challenged the establishment, making him a polarizing yet beloved figure.
🧾 Zubeen Garg’s Legacy and Controversies
| Aspect | Description | Public Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Musical Career | Over 25 albums, 2000+ songs | Cultural icon in Assam and Northeast |
| Activism | Vocal on indigenous rights, anti-corruption | Youth mobilization |
| Political Stance | Criticized multiple governments | Mixed reactions |
| Controversies | Accused of defamation, banned from events | Later reinstated, public support grew |
| Death Investigation | Ongoing SIT and international probe | High public interest |
Sarma’s remarks have reignited debates on how society treats dissenting voices during their lifetime versus after their death.
🧭 What to Watch in Zubeen Garg’s Case and Legacy
- SIT Findings: Expected to be shared by late October
- Singapore Police Cooperation: Key to forensic clarity
- Public Tributes: Memorial concerts and cultural events planned
- Political Fallout: Opposition may use case to target BJP in Assam
Sarma concluded, “Zubeen will live forever in Assam’s heart. But let us not dishonor him with hypocrisy and political games.”
Disclaimer
This news content is based on verified political statements, media reports, and public records as of October 17, 2025. It is intended for editorial use and public awareness. The information does not constitute legal advice, political endorsement, or investigative conclusion and adheres to ethical journalism standards.
