Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham launched a bold political and economic vision this week, dubbed ‘Manchesterism,’ aiming to signal the end of neoliberalism and offer a new model for national governance. The announcement, made via his campaign video for the upcoming by-election in Makerfield, positions his regional leadership as a potential blueprint for national change, proposing a departure from decades of market-driven economic policies.
The Genesis of Manchesterism
The concept of ‘Manchesterism,’ as presented by Burnham, represents a significant departure from its 19th-century namesake, which was synonymous with free trade and laissez-faire economics. Instead, Burnham’s 2026 doctrine signifies a deliberate move away from the principles of neoliberalism that have shaped British and global economic policy since the late 1970s.
This doctrine has been under development for many months, drawing inspiration from various political and economic thinkers and reflecting a growing dissatisfaction with the outcomes of neoliberal policies, such as widening inequality and the erosion of public services.
Challenging Neoliberal Orthodoxy
Neoliberalism, characterized by deregulation, privatization, and fiscal austerity, has been the dominant economic paradigm for decades. Proponents argued it fostered efficiency and growth. However, critics point to its role in exacerbating wealth disparities, weakening social safety nets, and contributing to financial instability.
Burnham’s ‘Manchesterism’ seeks to offer an alternative by prioritizing public investment, regional development, and a stronger role for the state in managing the economy. This approach emphasizes the importance of local control and tailored solutions over one-size-fits-all national policies.
Regional Power as a National Model
Burnham’s strategy leverages his position as Mayor of Greater Manchester, a devolved region with significant economic and political influence. By presenting his regional agenda as a viable national alternative, he aims to demonstrate that a different approach to governance is possible and effective.
This strategy is not without precedent. Various regions and cities have experimented with alternative economic models, often focusing on community wealth building, cooperative enterprises, and public services. Manchester, with its history of industrial innovation and strong civic identity, is seen by some as fertile ground for such experiments.
Expert and Data Perspectives
The call to move beyond neoliberalism resonates with a growing body of research. Reports from organizations like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have, in recent years, acknowledged that while globalization and market liberalization can spur growth, they have also contributed to rising inequality in many countries. A 2019 IMF paper byými researchers, including Jonathan Ostry, found that the benefits of globalization have not been shared equally.
Furthermore, think tanks and academics have been exploring alternative economic frameworks. The concept of ‘progressive regionalism’ or ‘devolution deals’ often emphasizes strengthening local economies through public procurement, support for local businesses, and investment in public infrastructure and skills. Data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) consistently highlights regional economic disparities within the UK, underscoring the need for localized economic strategies.
Implications for Governance and the Economy
If ‘Manchesterism’ gains traction, it could signal a significant shift in British politics, moving away from a centralized, market-focused approach towards a more decentralized, publicly-oriented model. This could lead to greater investment in public services, a stronger emphasis on regional economic development, and potentially new forms of public ownership or partnership.
For citizens, this could mean more responsive local governance, greater control over local economies, and a potential reduction in inequality. However, the practical implementation of such a broad vision presents considerable challenges, including securing national funding, navigating complex regulatory environments, and building consensus across different political and economic interests.
What to Watch Next
The success of Burnham’s ‘Manchesterism’ will likely depend on several factors. Key among these will be the outcome of the Makerfield by-election, which could provide a mandate for his vision. Observers will also be watching how his proposals are received by national political parties and policymakers, and whether other regions will adopt similar frameworks. The ability of Greater Manchester to demonstrate tangible improvements in economic well-being and public services under this new doctrine will be crucial in shaping its future influence.
